试论跨文化交际学的语言学研究路径

论文摘要

跨文化交际具有多学科、跨学科的性质,因此自从成为一门学科以来其研究路径有许多,如人类学、沟通学(communication)、语言学、符号学等,其中语言学的研究路径非常重要。在国内跨文化交际的语言学研究也有很多,但笔者发现大量研究多是针对具体问题,缺乏深入、系统的理论指导,也似乎很少有从宏观的角度去系统论述跨文化交际与语言学的关系。根据语言与文化的关系理论,语言是一切文化的主线之一,跨文化交际中隐蔽文化的核心部分也埋藏在语言之中,因而跨文化交际的语言学研究路径切实可行。本文试图以语言与文化的关系理论为依据,以由霍尔提出、经顾嘉祖发展的隐蔽文化理论为主线,从语言学的各个方面——内部语言学中的语音、语法和词汇与外部语言学中的社会语言学、人类文化语言学、修辞学、隐喻学和谜米学——对跨文化交际学的研究重点和难点,即隐蔽文化和其中的思想观念尤其是价值观,进行了全面而又系统的分析。其中每个方面都紧紧围绕隐蔽文化这个中心展开论述。跨文化交际最难跨越的障碍是文化障碍,因而要着重研究并揭示隐藏在语言之中的隐蔽文化,尤其是不同文化背景中人们的思想观念。因此,笔者认为跨文化交际学的语言学研究路径值得重视,并需要更加深入的研究。

论文目录

• Acknowledgements
• Abstract
• 摘要
• 前言
• 1.0 国际国内跨文化交际语言学研究路径的回顾
• 2.0 跨文化交际学的研究对象与研究路径
• 3.0 跨文化交际学的语言学研究路径的理论依据
• 4.0 跨文化交际的语言学研究路径探索
• 5.0 结束语
• Chapter 1 A Brief Survey of the Past and Present Scholarship Concerning Linguistic Approach to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 1.1 A Brief Survey of the Past and Present Scholarship Abroad
• 1.2 A Brief Survey of the Past and Present Scholarship in China
• 1.3 The Key Points as well as the Knotty Points in Intercultural Communication Studies
• Chapter 2 Theoretical Foundations for Linguistic Approach to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 2.1 Approaches to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 2.2 The Theoretical Foundations for Linguistic Approach to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 2.2.1 Language as One of the Dominant Threads in All Cultures
• 2.2.2 The Cultural Function of Language Requiring Linguistic Approach
• 2.2.3 The Core of the Covert Culture Hidden in Language
• 2.2.4 The Reaction of Language to Culture
• Chapter 3 A Probe into Linguistic Approach to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 3.1 Internal Linguistic Approaches to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 3.1.1 The Phonetic and Phonemic Approach to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 3.1.1.1 An Introduction
• 3.1.1.2 Evidences in Chinese
• 3.1.1.3 Evidences in English
• 3.1.1.4 Evidences as Found in Translation
• 3.1.1.5 A Summary
• 3.1.2 The Grammatical Approach to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 3.1.2.1 A Brief Introduction
• 3.1.2.2 Basic Cultural Differences as Reflected from Chinese and Western Grammars
• 3.1.2.3 Hierarchical Social Relationship as Reflected in Chinese and English Grammars
• 3.1.3 The Lexical Approach to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 3.1.3.1 The Importance of Cultural Connotations as Reflected in Lexicon
• 3.1.3.2 Connotative Similarities and Differences as Reflected in Color Words
• 3.1.3.3 Connotative Differences as Reflected in the Use of Numerals
• 3.1.3.4 A Summary
• 3.2 External Linguistic Approaches to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 3.2.1 The Sociolinguistic Approach to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 3.2.1.1 The Importance of Sociolinguistics to Cultural Studies
• 3.2.1.2 Gender Differences as Reflected in the Use of Language
• 3.2.1.3 Social Status as Reflected in Linguistic Variation
• 3.2.1.4 Ethnic Differences as Reflected in Linguistic Variation
• 3.2.1.5 A Summary
• 3.2.2 The Ethno-linguistic Approach to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 3.2.2.1 An Introduction to Ethno-linguistics
• 3.2.2.2 A Brief Survey of Ethno-linguistic Studies in China
• 3.2.2.3 Linguistic Sexism in Chinese and English
• 3.2.2.4 The Nature of Linguistic Sexism
• 3.2.2.5 A Summary
• 3.2.3 The Rhetorical Approach to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 3.2.3.1 The Definitions of Rhetoric in Different Cultures
• 3.2.3.2 Rhetorical Similarities and Differences in Chinese and English
• 3.2.3.3 A Summary
• 3.2.4 The Metaphorical Approach to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 3.2.4.1 A Brief Introduction to Metaphorical theories
• 3.2.4.2 Contrastive Values as Reflected in Two Metaphors
• 3.2.4.3 A Summary
• 3.2.5 The Memetic Approach to Intercultural Communication Studies
• 3.2.5.1 A Brief Introduction
• 3.2.5.2 The Relationship among Memes,Language and Culture
• 3.2.5.3 The Relationship between Memes and Intercultural Communication
• 3.2.5.4 The Enlightenments
• 3.2.5.5 A Summary
• Chapter 4 Conclusion
• Bibliography