基于组合模式的语法检查 ——短语结构语法与依存语法之结合

基于组合模式的语法检查 ——短语结构语法与依存语法之结合

论文摘要

合语法性检查是计算语言学研究领域中一个值得深入研究的问题。本研究主要讨论英语的合语法性检查。对于该问题,国外已有一些研究,如Kukich(1992)、Atwell and Elliott(1987)、Douglas and Dale(1992)、Golding and Schabes(1996;Kukich,1992)、Bustamante and León(1996)、Gojenola and Oronoz(2000)等都从不同的角度展开了讨论。此外,还有一些语法检查系统研究项目也值得我们回顾并参考。其中有Kuenning的Ispell、Atkinson的Aspell、Bernth的EasyEnglish、Jensen et al.的Critique、Bustamante and León的GramCheck以及Bredenkamp et al.的FLAG。 虽然语法检查系统的开发可以从确定性模型和非确定性模型两种不同的模式展开,但直接运用已有的句法分析系统来开发语法检查系统值得我们探讨。这样,想要设计一个比较成功的语法检查器,必须要有一个非常健壮的句法分析系统。目前,基于不同理论框架、应用不同方法构建的句法分析系统已有不少。其中,基于统计学模型的语法分析系统,如Collins(1999),准确率高,但速度不够快,应用于机辅适应性教学的服务器对学习者的输出进行实时处理不够理想。而链语法模型(Sleator&Temperley,1991;Lafferty et al.,1992)不但有较高的准确率,更重要地是,它在速度方面也有其过人之处。基于组合模式的英语语法检查系统正是基于链语法分析器的。因为链语法分析器的理论基础是链语法,它是一种与依存语法有着很近关系的语法模

论文目录

  • Table of Contents
  • List of Tables
  • List of Figures
  • Declaration
  • Acknowledgements
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • Major Publications
  • Abstract
  • 摘要
  • 1 Introduction
  • 1.1 Introduction
  • 1.2 Research overview
  • 1.3 Outline of the dissertation
  • 2 Literature Review
  • 2.1 Introduction
  • 2.2 Starting from tagging and parsing
  • 2.2.1 Taggers
  • 2.2.1.1 Linguistic models
  • 2.2.1.2 Statistic models
  • 2.2.1.3 Machine-learning models
  • 2.2.2 Parsers
  • 2.2.2.1 Context-free grammar models
  • 2.2.2.2 Context-free grammar models with context sensitivity
  • 2.2.2.3 Models with lexical sensitivity
  • 2.2.2.4 History-based models
  • 2.3 Grammar checkers
  • 2.3.1 Research review
  • 2.3.2 Projects review
  • 2.3.2.1 Ispell and Aspell
  • 2.3.2.2 Style and Diction
  • 2.3.2.3 EasyEnglish
  • 2.3.2.4 Critique
  • 2.3.2.5 CLAWS as a Grammar Checker
  • 2.3.2.6 GramCheck
  • 2.3.2.7 Grammar Checker by Park and his colleagues
  • 2.3.2.8 FLAG
  • 2.3.2.9 Style and grammar checker by Naber
  • 2.4 Grammar formalisms
  • 2.4.1 Dependency grammar
  • 2.4.1.1 Lucien Tesniére
  • 2.4.1.2 Post-Tesniére development
  • 2.4.1.3 Link grammar
  • 2.4.2 Link grammar: a detailed discussion
  • 2.4.2.1 Links
  • 2.4.2.2 Basic assumptions
  • 2.4.2.3 Dictionary and linking requirements
  • 2.4.2.4 Post-processing
  • 2.4.2.5 Speed and robustness features
  • 2.4.2.6 The cost system
  • 2.4.2.7 Differences between Link grammar and other dependency-related grammars
  • 2.4.3 Transformation-based machine learning algorithm
  • 2.4.3.1 Initial state of the parser
  • 2.4.3.2 Structural Transformations
  • 2.4.3.3 Learning Transformations
  • 2.5 Summary
  • 3 Research Questions
  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Researches related to link grammar
  • 3.3 Detailed study of the Link Parser
  • 3.3.1 Merit of link grammar for the purpose of grammar checking
  • 3.3.2 An evaluation of the parser
  • 3.3.3 A closer examination
  • 3.3.4 Problems to be addressed
  • 3.4 Research questions
  • 3.5 Objectives of this research
  • 3.6 Summary
  • 4 Theoretical Framework
  • 4.1 Introduction
  • 4.2 Phrase structure grammars vs. dependency grammars
  • 4.3 On combined models
  • 4.4 Grammar checking in the combined model: Link Parser incorporated with phrase structure information
  • 4.4.1 Phase One
  • 4.4.2 Phase Two
  • 4.4.3 Phase Three
  • 4.5 The Grammar checker
  • 4.5.1 The interface
  • 4.5.2 Speed of the grammar checker
  • 4.5.3 Evaluation of the grammar checker
  • 4.6 Summary
  • 5 Research Design
  • 5.1 Research methodology
  • 5.2 Implementation of the combined model
  • 5.2.1 Preparing the training corpus
  • 5.2.2 Training in transformation-based machine learning algorithm
  • 5.2.2.1 The comparison algorithm
  • 5.2.2.2 Training process
  • 5.2.3 Applying the knowledge to the post processing stage in the Link Parser
  • 5.3 Evaluation of the combined model
  • 5.4 Summary
  • 6 Research Outcome: Evaluating the Combined Model
  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Experiment Ⅰ
  • 6.2.1 Objectives of the experiment
  • 6.2.2 Test set
  • 6.2.3 Result and analysis
  • 6.2.4 Case study
  • 6.3 Experiment Ⅱ
  • 6.3.1 Objectives of this experiment
  • 6.3.2 Test set
  • 6.3.3 Result and analysis
  • 6.4 Performance of the grammar checker
  • 6.5 Summary
  • 7 Conclusion
  • 7.1 Conclusion
  • 7.2 Remaining issues and future work
  • 7.2.1 Error and error judgment
  • 7.2.2 Adaptiveness to CLEC
  • 7.2.3 Code-level refinement
  • A The C source code of the main part of the grammar checker
  • B The Perl 5.6 code of the comparison algorithm
  • C The rule-set learned for the transformation-based machine-learning algorithm
  • D Test set of the 83 sentences in Experiment Ⅰ
  • E Re-ranking of the 16 linkages of Sentence 40 in Experiment Ⅰ
  • F Test set of the 427 sentences in Experiment Ⅱ
  • G Downloading address of the Grammar Checker for evaluation
  • Bibliography
  • Index
  • 相关论文文献

    • [1].Retrospect of Ditransitive Construction[J]. 海外英语 2020(03)
    • [2].English Grammar Comparison:Descriptive Grammar vs.Prescriptive Grammar[J]. 海外英语 2015(02)
    • [3].A brief analysis of the necessity of grammar teaching in CLT[J]. 青春岁月 2017(23)
    • [4].Analysis of optimization design of interesting teaching of English grammar in senior high schools[J]. 中学生英语 2018(24)
    • [5].Researches on Problems in College Students' Grammar Learning and Countermeasures[J]. 校园英语 2016(35)
    • [6].Teachers' Perceptions of Teaching Grammar in Young Learners' Classroom[J]. 校园英语 2016(35)
    • [7].Analyses of Common Grammar Mistakes in High-school English[J]. 校园英语 2017(03)
    • [8].How to Learn English Grammar?[J]. 校园英语 2017(03)
    • [9].Grammar Teaching[J]. 校园英语 2017(28)
    • [10].Inductive Approach of English Grammar in Middle School Class from the Perspective of Second Language Acquisition[J]. 校园英语 2017(25)
    • [11].How to Improve the Interest for Learning English Grammar[J]. 校园英语 2017(30)
    • [12].Grammar Teaching Methods Comparison in ESL Teaching[J]. 校园英语 2016(13)
    • [13].Negative Transfer of L1 on English Grammar Learning in SLA[J]. 校园英语 2015(11)
    • [14].English Grammar[J]. Reading and Composition(Junior High)(English) 2011(04)
    • [15].A Communicative Approach to College English Grammar Teaching and Learning[J]. 海外英语 2016(07)
    • [16].Research on English Grammar Theory[J]. 校园英语 2019(02)
    • [17].Under the background of new curriculum English grammar teaching should be strengthened in high school[J]. 校园英语 2019(47)
    • [18].Grammar and Grammar Teaching——A Reflective Journal of Grammar and Communication[J]. 读与写(教育教学刊) 2010(04)
    • [19].A Book Review on Assessing Grammar[J]. 中国校外教育 2009(S4)
    • [20].Analysis of optimization design of interesting teaching of English grammar in Senior High School[J]. 中学生英语 2018(04)
    • [21].The Best Way To Learn English Grammar[J]. 第二课堂(A) 2016(01)
    • [22].On the Place of Grammar in ELT in China[J]. 校园英语 2012(10)
    • [23].A Brief Survey Study of English Grammar Teaching Issues and Strategies at Medical College[J]. 科技信息 2013(20)
    • [24].A Comparative Study of Grammar Teaching in the Grammar-Translation, Audio-Lingual and Communicative Approaches[J]. 科技信息 2012(20)
    • [25].Importance of Grammar in English Teaching[J]. 科技信息 2011(13)
    • [26].Teaching Grammar to Students at Basic and Intermediate Levels[J]. 海外英语 2018(09)
    • [27].Introduction to "Ma Shi Wen Tong"[J]. 科教导刊(下旬) 2015(10)
    • [28].Teaching Grammar in a Communicative Approach[J]. 课程教育研究 2014(20)
    • [29].The Nature of Grammar[J]. 读与写(教育教学刊) 2012(08)
    • [30].新课程理念下如何有效地进行语法教学(英文)[J]. 校园英语 2018(06)

    标签:;  ;  ;  ;  

    基于组合模式的语法检查 ——短语结构语法与依存语法之结合
    下载Doc文档

    猜你喜欢