HAVE范式的一致性句法分析

论文摘要

乔姆斯基的最简方案旨在揭示语言本质。基于此目的,本文以HAVE范式作为个案研究,尝试发现一类特殊的表层结构可以简化为一个底层结构与一些独立的原则相互作用。通过探讨HAVE的各类用法和特性,归纳出普遍语法（UG）的独立原则,进而用于解释其它语言的相关语言现象。本文重点介绍了一种“最省力的”分析方法——HAVE分解法以及其最主要的三位代表人物Benveniste,Freeze,和Kayne。通过具体分析,笔者认为HAVE具有如下特性:（1）HAVE结构中,除了语音式,逻辑式同样也参与了给特定单词分配意义;（2）所有类型的HAVE在本质上是相同的,仅存在一个“动词”HAVE,HAVE的各种解释是由句法结构推导出来的,HAVE丰富的解释恰恰是因为其意义在语音式层面上具有不确定性;（3）HAVE分解法使得对HAVE范式进行一致性分析成为现实。这种方法可以使得一个单一的词项在词库中只有唯一的表达式。本文最大的发现是:HAVE范式的所有结构都是按照同一句法推导过程P+BE而形成的,其差异仅仅在于PP（prepositional phrase）中的限定语究竟由什么成分充当,同时还受到语义学和语用学相关原则规则的制约。

论文目录

• ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
• 摘要
• ABSTRACT
• 前言
• 1. 论文选题的理由及意义
• 2. 本领域的前沿动态
• 3. 研究目的、研究方法和拟解决的关键问题
• 4. 本论文的创新性成果和结论
• CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
• 1.1 Relevance of the Subject to Linguistic Theory
• 1.2 Scope of the Study
• 1.3 Aims of the Study
• 1.4 Why HAVE?
• 1.5 Outline of the Dissertation
• CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
• 2.1 Traditional Grammar's Correlative Study
• 2.2 Generative Grammar's Correlative Study
• 2.3 Alternative New Angle of View
• 2.3.1 Benveniste's Viewpoint
• 2.3.2 Kayne Meets Freeze
• CHAPTER 3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
• 3.1 Introduction:the Minimalist Program
• 3.2 Basic mechanisms for building syntactic structures
• 3.2.1 X-bar Theory
• 3.2.2 Movement
• 3.3 Decompositional Approach
• CHAPTER 4 ON THE SEMANTICS AND CLASSIFICATION OF HAVE
• 4.1 Lexical Semantics of HAVE
• 4.2 Lexical Classification of HAVE
• CHAPTER 5 UNIFIED SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS IN THE HAVE PARADIGM
• 5.1 Possibility and Necessity of a Unified Analysis of HAVE
• 5.2 Unified Analysis and Decompositional Approach
• 5.2.1 Two Variants of Decompositional Approach
• 5.2.2 Reduction-towards the Ultimate Unified Decompositional Approach
• 5.2.3 Validity of Decompositional Approach
• 5.3 Decompositional Approach to HAVE
• 5.3.1 Possessive HAVE
• 5.3.2 Auxiliary HAVE
• 5.3.3 Causative and Experiencer HAVE
• 5.3.4 Locative HAVE
• 5.3.5 Two Virgin Soils in HAVE Paradigm-Nominal Events as the Complement of HAVE and Modal HAVE
• CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION
• REFERENCES
• ABBREVIATIONS