:An Unmitigated Disaster: Shifting from Response and Recovery to Mitigation for an Insurable Future论文

:An Unmitigated Disaster: Shifting from Response and Recovery to Mitigation for an Insurable Future论文

本文主要研究内容

作者(2019)在《An Unmitigated Disaster: Shifting from Response and Recovery to Mitigation for an Insurable Future》一文中研究指出:Australian households are increasingly vulnerable to natural hazard-related disasters. To manage disaster risk, government commissioned inquiries have called for greater investment in mitigation. This article critically examines the call for a shift in funding priority towards pre-disaster mitigation measures, in the context of growing concerns around the ability of households to access and afford insurance. It examines mitigation measures in the context of three prominent Australian disasters: the Black Saturday bushfires(Victoria, 2009), the Queensland floods(2010–2011), and Cyclone Yasi(Queensland, 2011). We argue that as a mode of disaster security, mitigation operates as a complex assemblage of logics and practices of protection, preparedness, and resilience, which problematizes simplistic protection/resilience binaries. On the one hand, mitigation serves as a mode of protection, which underscores the dominant maladaptive rationality of insurance. It promises a collective solution to uninsurability that is limited by government fiscal constraints and growing employment of risk-reflective insurance pricing.On the other hand, there is evidence of an emergent rationality of household insurance as a path to resilience and preparedness—for example, in the development of insurance systems that price household retrofitting technologies and in the development of policyholder education campaigns. This resilience rationality holds the promise of securing individuals previously excluded from insurance.However, for householders lacking the necessary physical,cognitive, and financial capacities to make themselves and their properties resilient, the transition to a pre-disaster mitigation mode of security will likely do little to alleviate disadvantage and marginalization.

Abstract

Australian households are increasingly vulnerable to natural hazard-related disasters. To manage disaster risk, government commissioned inquiries have called for greater investment in mitigation. This article critically examines the call for a shift in funding priority towards pre-disaster mitigation measures, in the context of growing concerns around the ability of households to access and afford insurance. It examines mitigation measures in the context of three prominent Australian disasters: the Black Saturday bushfires(Victoria, 2009), the Queensland floods(2010–2011), and Cyclone Yasi(Queensland, 2011). We argue that as a mode of disaster security, mitigation operates as a complex assemblage of logics and practices of protection, preparedness, and resilience, which problematizes simplistic protection/resilience binaries. On the one hand, mitigation serves as a mode of protection, which underscores the dominant maladaptive rationality of insurance. It promises a collective solution to uninsurability that is limited by government fiscal constraints and growing employment of risk-reflective insurance pricing.On the other hand, there is evidence of an emergent rationality of household insurance as a path to resilience and preparedness—for example, in the development of insurance systems that price household retrofitting technologies and in the development of policyholder education campaigns. This resilience rationality holds the promise of securing individuals previously excluded from insurance.However, for householders lacking the necessary physical,cognitive, and financial capacities to make themselves and their properties resilient, the transition to a pre-disaster mitigation mode of security will likely do little to alleviate disadvantage and marginalization.

论文参考文献

  • [1].Attributes,challenges and future directions of community resilience[J]. Bo MENG,Nan LI,Dongping FANG.  Frontiers of Engineering Management.2018(03)
  • [2].Towards a Local-Level Resilience Composite Index: Introducing Different Degrees of Indicator Quantification[J]. Sebastian Jlich.  International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.2017(01)
  • [3].Visually Modelling Collaborative Research into Innovative Community Disaster Resilience Practice,Strategy,and Governance[J]. Thomas J.Huggins,Robin Peace,Stephen R.Hill,David M.Johnston,Alicia Cuevas Mu iz.  International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.2015(03)
  • [4].Mobile Home Residents and Hurricane Vulnerability in South Florida:Research Gaps and Challenges[J]. Shivangi Prasad,Justin Stoler.  International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.2016(04)
  • [5].从安全工程角度谈弹复性工程的起源与发展(英文)[J]. 王俊伟,宋明莹,周耀明,丁进良.  控制工程.2015(04)
  • [6].A Framework for Disaster Vulnerability in a Small Island in the Southwest Pacific: A Case Study of Emae Island, Vanuatu[J]. Guy Jackson,Karen McNamara,Bradd Witt.  International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.2017(04)
  • [7].The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: Renewing the Global Commitment to People’s Resilience, Health,and Well-being[J]. Amina Aitsi-Selmi,Shinichi Egawa,Hiroyuki Sasaki,Chadia Wannous,Virginia Murray.  International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.2015(02)
  • [8].Taking Time, Sharing Spaces: Adaptive Risk Governance Processes in Rural Japan[J]. Ilan Chabay.  International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.2018(04)
  • [9].The Role of Public Health Within the United Nations Post-2015 Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction[J]. Virginia Murray,Amina Aitsi-Selmi,Kevin Blanchard.  International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.2015(01)
  • [10].Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management (Health-EDRM):Developing the Research Field within the Sendai Framework Paradigm[J]. Sharon Tsoon Ting Lo,Emily Ying Yang Chan,Gloria Kwong Wai Chan,Virginia Murray,Jonathan Abrahams,Ali Ardalan,Ryoma Kayano,Johnny Chung Wai Yau.  International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.2017(02)
  • 论文详细介绍

    论文作者分别是来自International Journal of Disaster Risk Science的,发表于刊物International Journal of Disaster Risk Science2019年02期论文,是一篇关于,International Journal of Disaster Risk Science2019年02期论文的文章。本文可供学术参考使用,各位学者可以免费参考阅读下载,文章观点不代表本站观点,资料来自International Journal of Disaster Risk Science2019年02期论文网站,若本站收录的文献无意侵犯了您的著作版权,请联系我们删除。

    标签:;  

    :An Unmitigated Disaster: Shifting from Response and Recovery to Mitigation for an Insurable Future论文
    下载Doc文档

    猜你喜欢