:Disturbance increases high tide travel distance of a roosting shorebird but only marginally affects daily energy expenditure论文

:Disturbance increases high tide travel distance of a roosting shorebird but only marginally affects daily energy expenditure论文

本文主要研究内容

作者(2019)在《Disturbance increases high tide travel distance of a roosting shorebird but only marginally affects daily energy expenditure》一文中研究指出:Background: Anthropogenic disturbance can negatively affect an animal’s energy budget by evoking movement responses. Existing research focuses mainly on immediate displacement as a disturbance effect, since this can be eas?ily observed in the field. However, effects on movement over longer timescales are poorly examined and it is largely unknown if and to what extent they reflect immediate responses. Longer?term responses could for example be larger than immediate responses if birds, after disturbance, return to the original location and thereby travel twice the immediate disturbed distance.Methods: We combined GPS tracking data with observational data to quantify the effects of anthropogenic(air force and walkers) and non?anthropogenic disturbances on distances travelled by roosting Eurasian Oystercatchers(Haematopus ostralegus) during the non?breeding season. We compared immediate displacement after a disturbance with distance travelled during the entire high tide period(longer?term response), while accounting for environmental fac?tors. Additionally, we calculated energy expenditure due to disturbance based on observed disturbance frequencies.Results: Disturbance resulted in an immediate displacement response of ~ 200 m(median). Air force disturbances tended to yield larger immediate responses than walker and, especially, than non?anthropogenic disturbances. Longer?term responses and immediate responses were approximately similar, suggesting that, over longer timescales, spatial disturbance effects in the study area remain confined to immediate effects. However, disturbances were infrequent(0.17 disturbances per bird per hour) and most disturbances were of natural origin(62%). Consequently, anthropogenic disturbance of roosting oystercatchers in the study area on average costs 0.08% of the daily energy expenditure.Conclusions: Our results suggest that immediate spatial responses to disturbance can be a useful proxy for spatial responses over longer timescales. Over the non?exhaustive range of conditions investigated, energetic consequences of spatial disturbance responses for an oystercatcher in the study area are marginal due to low disturbance levels.

Abstract

Background: Anthropogenic disturbance can negatively affect an animal’s energy budget by evoking movement responses. Existing research focuses mainly on immediate displacement as a disturbance effect, since this can be eas?ily observed in the field. However, effects on movement over longer timescales are poorly examined and it is largely unknown if and to what extent they reflect immediate responses. Longer?term responses could for example be larger than immediate responses if birds, after disturbance, return to the original location and thereby travel twice the immediate disturbed distance.Methods: We combined GPS tracking data with observational data to quantify the effects of anthropogenic(air force and walkers) and non?anthropogenic disturbances on distances travelled by roosting Eurasian Oystercatchers(Haematopus ostralegus) during the non?breeding season. We compared immediate displacement after a disturbance with distance travelled during the entire high tide period(longer?term response), while accounting for environmental fac?tors. Additionally, we calculated energy expenditure due to disturbance based on observed disturbance frequencies.Results: Disturbance resulted in an immediate displacement response of ~ 200 m(median). Air force disturbances tended to yield larger immediate responses than walker and, especially, than non?anthropogenic disturbances. Longer?term responses and immediate responses were approximately similar, suggesting that, over longer timescales, spatial disturbance effects in the study area remain confined to immediate effects. However, disturbances were infrequent(0.17 disturbances per bird per hour) and most disturbances were of natural origin(62%). Consequently, anthropogenic disturbance of roosting oystercatchers in the study area on average costs 0.08% of the daily energy expenditure.Conclusions: Our results suggest that immediate spatial responses to disturbance can be a useful proxy for spatial responses over longer timescales. Over the non?exhaustive range of conditions investigated, energetic consequences of spatial disturbance responses for an oystercatcher in the study area are marginal due to low disturbance levels.

论文参考文献

  • [1].Fluctuating resources,disturbance and plant strategies:diverse mechanisms underlying plant invasions[J]. Ian J RADFORD.  Journal of Arid Land.2013(03)
  • [2].Tolerance of disturbance by humans in long-time resident and recent colonist urban doves[J]. Jemma Gendall,Alan Lill,Juliey Beckman.  Avian Research.2015(02)
  • [3].Effect of Human Disturbance on Species Diversity of Staphylidae[J]. Li Yujie,Zhang Jindong.  Plant Diseases and Pests.2015(06)
  • [4].Is maturity index an efficient tool to assess the effects of the physical disturbance on the marine nematode assemblages?—A critical interpretation of disturbance-induced maturity successions in some study cases in Maldives[J]. SEMPRUCCI F.,COLANTONI P.,BALSAMO M..  Acta Oceanologica Sinica.2016(04)
  • [5].The effects of disturbance on forest structure and diversity at different altitudes in Garhwal Himalaya[J]. Munesh KUMAR,Chandra Mohan SHARMA,Govind Singh RA JWAR.  生态学杂志.2009(03)
  • [6].Copper pollution decreases the resistance of soil microbial community to subsequent dry–rewetting disturbance[J]. Jing Li,Jun-Tao Wang,Hang-Wei Hu,Yi-Bing Ma,Li-Mei Zhang,Ji-Zheng He.  Journal of Environmental Sciences.2016(01)
  • [7].Experiment study of the effects of hydrodynamic disturbance on the interaction between the cyanobacterial growth and the nutrients[J]. 黄健,席北斗,许秋瑾,王喜喜,李卫平,何连生,刘鸿亮.  Journal of Hydrodynamics.2016(03)
  • [8].Study on Disturbances and Its Effects on Nature Reserves[J]. Zhang Linying1,2, Zhou Yongzhang2 & Xu Songjun1 1. College of Geographical Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China; 2. Center of Earth Environment and Resources, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.  Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment.2006(03)
  • [9].Behavioral responses of blue sheep(Pseudois nayaur) to nonlethal human recreational disturbance[J]. JIANG TianYi,WANG XiaoMing,DING YouZhong,LIU ZhenSheng,WANG ZhengHuan.  Chinese Science Bulletin.2013(18)
  • [10].Response of tropical avifauna to visitor recreational disturbances: a case study from the Sinharaja World Heritage Forest, Sri Lanka[J]. Nilusha S.Alwis,Priyan Perera,Nihal P.Dayawansa.  Avian Research.2016(03)
  • 论文详细介绍

    论文作者分别是来自Avian Research的,发表于刊物Avian Research2019年03期论文,是一篇关于,Avian Research2019年03期论文的文章。本文可供学术参考使用,各位学者可以免费参考阅读下载,文章观点不代表本站观点,资料来自Avian Research2019年03期论文网站,若本站收录的文献无意侵犯了您的著作版权,请联系我们删除。

    标签:;  

    :Disturbance increases high tide travel distance of a roosting shorebird but only marginally affects daily energy expenditure论文
    下载Doc文档

    猜你喜欢