论文摘要
本论文从跨文交际角度对口语邀请回应言语行为进行了证研究。通过查阅回顾邀请言语行为方面文,者发至今还没有学者对中英口语邀请言语行为出过跨文交际方面比较研究,因,者选题目一证性研究,其目在于比较中英口语邀请回应言语行为在模和策略上异同,同时还考察社会变量在中英两种语境中对邀请策略产生影响。本研究意义在于增强人们跨文交际意,促进邀请回应言语方面功跨文交际。全文共分七部分。第一,二两章简单入并陈述了目前内外学者对邀请言语行为研究状况其。第三章罗本轮理论框架,第四章描述了本研究方法。第五,六两章对所搜数进行分析讨论,最后一章总结全文,并指出文启和局限性。论文理论支撑包括奥斯汀和塞尔言语行为理论(Austin,1962 Searle,1975),利奇(1983)礼貌原,布朗和莱文森(1978,1987)礼貌理论以顾曰(1990)中礼貌原。研究方法为定量分析法;研究工采用访谈录单和修后语篇补全问卷,分发中美50名受用以相关语。者从两面分析语,出如下结论:在会面,中人多种邀请回应结构,即一分,两分,三分结构模并用;美人只有一种典一分结构。在句面上,一邀请回应言语行为被分析归纳为四种分:预邀请,核心邀请,接受回应回应,分中总结出中美策略。者将语篇补全问卷所数输入SPSS软件进行统,结显三社会变量,即社会离,权势和强加程度对中美邀请策略选都有影响;另外,通过卡方检验,中美在预邀请,核心邀请,接受和中,都有部分策略数上显著性区别,差异存在可以在文差异上找原因。
论文目录
Abstract摘要List of abbreviationsList of figuresList of TablesChapter 1. Introduction1.1 Definitions and classifications of invitation1.2 The purpose and significance of the study1.3 Organization of this thesisChapter 2. Literature Review2.1 Review of related studies abroad about invitation speech act2.2 Review of related studies at home about invitation speech actChapter 3. Theoretical Background3.1 Speech Act Theories3.1.1 Austin s Speech Act theory3.1.2 Searle s Indirect Speech Act theory3.2 Politeness Theories3.2.1 Leech s politeness principle3.2.2 Brown and Levinson s Politeness Theory3.2.2.1 Face3.2.2.2 Face threatening acts3.2.2.3 Politeness strategies3.2.3 Chinese Politeness3.3 Theoretical Hints of InvitationChapter 4. Methodology4.1 Objectives4.2 Subjects4.3 Research Instruments4.4 Methods4.5 Research ProcedureChapter 5. Results and Discussion5.1 Sequential Patterns of Invitation-Response Speech Act5.1.1 Sequential Structure of Invitation-Response Speech Act in Chinese Context5.1.2 Sequential Structure of Invitation-Response Speech Act in English Context5.1.3 Discussion5.2 Semantic Formulas of Invitation-Response Speech Act5.2.1 Pre-invitation5.2.2 Core invitation5.2.3 Acceptance5.2.4 RefusalChapter 6. Data Analysis and Discussion6.1 Influence of Social Variables on inviting strategies6.1.1 Social Distance6.1.1.1 Influence of social distance on English inviting strategy6.1.1.2 Influence of social distance on Chinese inviting strategy6.1.2 Relative Power6.1.2.1 Influence of relative power on English inviting strategy6.1.2.2 Influence of relative power on Chinese inviting strategy6.1.3 Rank of Imposition6.1.3.1 Influence of rank of imposition on English inviting strategy6.1.3.2 Influence of rank of imposition on Chinese inviting strategy6.2 Comparison of English and Chinese Invitation-Response Speech Act in Strategy Use6.2.1 Pre-invitation6.2.2 Core invitation6.2.3 Acceptance6.2.4 Refusal6.2.5 Discussion6.2.5.1 Power Distance6.2.5.2 Individualism-CollectivismChapter 7. Conclusion7.1 Summary7.2 Implication7.3 LimitationReferencesAppendix IAppendix IIAcknowledgements
相关论文文献
标签:邀请回应言语行为论文; 跨文交际论文; 礼貌论文; 社会变量论文;