批评式语篇分析中的互文性研究

批评式语篇分析中的互文性研究

论文摘要

本论文在互文性和批评式语篇分析研究的基础上,结合韩礼德系统功能语法、认知语言学的认知模式理论及其他学者相关理论探讨了互文性的意识形态功能。自互文性概念提出和批评语言学确立起其地位以来,有关互文性和批评式语篇分析的研究已经取得了很多成果。但是由于用批评式方法研究互文性的历史相对短,该领域还有不少需要发展的地方。同时用认知模式理论对本课题的研究尚属前沿。本文在语篇分析中结合费尔克劳的三维理论框架和汤普森“深度阐释学的方法论框架”运用三维分析模式对不同性质的语篇进行了分析,以期使该研究建立在坚实的理论基础上。本文主要采用了定性,理论与内省相结合的研究方法。针对批评式语篇分析中的互文性,作者提出了以下两个假设:1、相对于始言者,互文性服务于传递当前说话人的意识形态;2、互文性的意识形态功能通过改变受话人当前认知模式得以更好地实现。通过定性、理论与内省相结合方法对不同性质语篇的分析,本文的两个假设取得了充分的验证。从理论意义上讲,这将丰富和促进目前对于互文性和批评语言学相关领域的发展,弥补了目前对批评式互文性研究的不足。其实际意义则体现在提高人们对于语篇中互文性意识形态意义理解的敏锐力。讨论部分作者又从语域理论入手,换角度对体裁互文性的意识形态功能做了论证。结论部分总结了本研究的系统功能和认知阐释,并进而探讨了本研究的局限性和对本研究的进一步发展的前景展望。

论文目录

  • 摘要
  • Abstract
  • Chapter 1 Introduction
  • 1.1 The Problem
  • 1.1.1 The Origin of Intertextuality
  • 1.1.2 The Development of CDA
  • 1.1.3 Introducing Intertextuality into CDA
  • 1.1.4 The Deficiency of the Previous Study
  • 1.2 Research Questions and Objectives
  • 1.2.1 Research Questions
  • 1.2.2 Objectives
  • 1.3 Types of Research and Hypothesis
  • 1.3.1 Type of Research
  • 1.3.2 Hypothesis Presented
  • Chapter 2 Theoretical Framework and Related Literature
  • 2.1 Theoretical Framework
  • 2.1.1 Introduction
  • 2.1.2 Halliday’s Systemic-functional Grammar Model
  • 2.1.3 CDA Model
  • 2.1.4 Intertextuality Analysis Model
  • 2.1.5 Prominence Model
  • 2.1.6 Minsky’s Frame Model
  • 2.1.7 Key Concepts Related to the Study
  • 2.2 Related Literature
  • 2.2.1 Fairclough
  • 2.2.2 Devitt and Bazerman
  • 2.2.3 Lemke
  • 2.2.4 White
  • 2.2.5 Native Scholars
  • Chapter 3 Method
  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Sample Collection
  • 3.3 Three-dimensional Analysis
  • 3.3.1 Social-historical Analysis
  • 3.3.2 Description and Interpretation of Specific Intertextuality
  • 3.3.3 Description and Interpretation of Generic Intertextuality
  • 3.4 Comparative Analysis
  • Chapter 4 Results
  • 4.1 Introduction
  • 4.2 Intertextuality and Ideology Transfer
  • 4.2.1 Specific Intertextuality: Analysis of News Samples
  • 4.2.2 Generic Intertextuality in CDA: Sample 3
  • 4.3 Intertextuality and Cognitive Model
  • 4.3.1 Specific Intertextuality: News Samples
  • 4.3.2 Generic Intertextuality: Sample 3
  • 4.4 Summary
  • Chapter 5 Discussion
  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Register and Generic Intertextuality
  • 5.3 Theoretical Significance of the Study of Intertextuality in CDA
  • 5.4 Practical Significance of the Study of Intertextuality in CDA
  • 5.5 Problems and Difficulties Encountered
  • Chapter 6 Conclusion
  • 6.1 Summary
  • 6.2 Validity and Reliability
  • 6.3 Limitations and Further Research
  • References
  • Appendix
  • Published Paper
  • Acknowledgements
  • 相关论文文献

    • [1].The Logic of Change of the CPC's Human Rights Discourse Since the Founding of the People's Republic of China[J]. The Journal of Human Rights 2020(01)
    • [2].Teaching speaking from a discourse perspective[J]. 长江丛刊 2016(35)
    • [3].The application of discourse analysis theory in English reading teaching[J]. 山西青年 2017(01)
    • [4].A Review of the Ecocritical Reading of Water Imagery in Postcolonial Novels[J]. 校园英语 2017(24)
    • [5].Context and its Role in Explaining Discourse Coherence[J]. 校园英语 2017(27)
    • [6].Negotiation of Role Relations in E-discourse:A Case Study of an Online Travel Forum[J]. Annual Review of Functional Linguistics 2010(00)
    • [7].Three Aspects as Considered of Discourse Analysis:World,Language and Participants[J]. 校园英语 2014(27)
    • [8].Eco-discourse Analysis within the Framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. 海外英语 2020(16)
    • [9].The Translingual Practice of Human Rights: Value Tyranny and Overlapping Consensus of Cultures[J]. Human Rights 2014(06)
    • [10].A Study on College English Teachers'Use of discourse Markers[J]. 读与写(教育教学刊) 2009(11)
    • [11].Gender Discourse[J]. 校园英语 2016(15)
    • [12].Argumentation Analysis——A discourse Approach[J]. 现代企业教育 2012(09)
    • [13].Innovation of Chinese Discourse in the Context of Reform and Opening Up[J]. Contemporary Social Sciences 2020(03)
    • [14].Aspects of Transitivity in Select Social Transformation Discourse in Nigeria[J]. Language and Semiotic Studies 2020(02)
    • [15].Research on Discourse Markers from the Perspective of Relevance Theory[J]. 海外英语 2019(15)
    • [16].The Literature Review of Domestic Researches on Critical Discourse Analysis in Recent Ten Years[J]. 校园英语 2020(17)
    • [17].An Abnormal Created by Power Discourse— A Foucauldian Interpretation of Maurice[J]. 读与写(教育教学刊) 2014(04)
    • [18].Similarities in Early Chinese and Western Translation Discourse[J]. 校园英语 2018(03)
    • [19].Logical inferences in discourse analysis[J]. 科技视界 2014(26)
    • [20].The Subtitle Translation of Movie from the Perspective of Multimodal Discourse Analysis[J]. 海外英语 2020(11)
    • [21].A Summary of the Seminar on “Construction of China's Human Rights Discourse System in the New Era”[J]. The Journal of Human Rights 2018(03)
    • [22].Discourse, Power, Ideology in Advertisement Video[J]. 校园英语 2019(40)
    • [23].英汉互译实践与分析(四)[J]. 译苑新谭 2019(02)
    • [24].What,according to Michel Foucault,characterizes the order of discourse?[J]. 读与写(教育教学刊) 2011(08)
    • [25].再议术语翻译的规范性问题——以“discourse”译名为例[J]. 外语研究 2013(03)
    • [26].Development and Evaluation of Two Discourse-Based ELT Tasks in Business English Class[J]. 海外英语 2011(12)
    • [27].Identification by Antithesis and Oppositional Discourse Reproduction in Chinese Space of New Media[J]. Language and Semiotic Studies 2017(04)
    • [28].Research on Discourse Analysis of the News[J]. 海外英语 2011(08)
    • [29].“Discourse”的含义及其汉译[J]. 燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 2010(01)
    • [30].Cursory Analysis of the Influence of Cognition to Discourse[J]. 科技信息 2010(23)

    标签:;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

    批评式语篇分析中的互文性研究
    下载Doc文档

    猜你喜欢